Both federal and state laws protect employees from being discriminated against in the workplace based on specific protected traits, such as race, religion, and disability.
While employees who have been the victims of workplace discrimination do have legal recourse, it can be difficult to file a claim with the appropriate agencies within the required time frame. If you live in Ohio and were recently fired, demoted, or harassed based on one of these protected categories, you should speak with an experienced employment attorney who can evaluate your case and advise you on your next steps.
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act protects employees from discrimination based on:
Ohio law also provides protection from discrimination from the above and further protects from discrimination based on:
Discrimination based on race or color involves treating an applicant or employee unfavorably because he or she is of a certain race. This includes a prohibition against harassment, such as making inappropriate jokes, using racial slurs, and displaying racially offensive symbols. Although some statements do not reach the level of harassment, it does become illegal when it is frequent enough or severe enough that it creates a hostile work environment or when it leads to a demotion or termination.
Generally, employers can make rules or policies as long as they apply to all employees equally. Even if a policy is equal on its face it can still be illegal if it has the effect of discriminating against certain applicants or employees. For example, a policy that states that the company will not hire anyone who comes from a neighborhood that happens to be heavily Latino is neutral on its face but has the effect of discriminating against Latino employees.
It is unlawful to create an employment policy that applies to everyone if:
Sex discrimination involves treating a person unfairly because of his or her gender. This includes discrimination based on:
This type of discrimination can also take the form of sexual harassment, which includes:
Federal law protects both employees and applicants who belong to traditional organized religions as well as those who have less well-known but sincerely held religious, moral, or ethical beliefs from being discriminated against. Title VII also specifically prohibits workplace segregation based on religion, including religious attire. This means that an employer can be held liable for assigning a qualified employee to a position in a company that does not require customer interaction because of perceived customer preference (for example a customer preference against headscarves, yarmulkes, or traditional Mennonite attire).
The law also requires employers to make reasonable accommodations for an employee’s religious practices. The only exception to this rule is when making accommodations would cause an undue burden to the employer’s business operations. Examples of common religious accommodations include:
However, employers will not be required to make accommodations when doing so would result in an undue hardship on the employer. An accommodation will be considered an undue hardship if:
Finally, an employee cannot be forced to participate or not participate in a religious activity as a condition of gaining or keeping employment.
If you have been discriminated against at work, please contact Marshall Forman & Schlein LLC to speak to an attorney about your situation.
I have nothing but good words for this law firm, especially for Helen Robinson, who worked with me in my employment case. She is very good at what she does, very knowledgeable, friendly, warm, and responsive. Every time we talk, she makes sure that I get the answers I need…
When I first contacted Helen Robinson, I felt hopeless and beaten down by my situation. With few resources, I was still desperate to right the wrong that was done to me. From our very first consultation, Helen was empathetic, knowledgeable, and transparent. She placed the power back into my hands.…
Marshall Forman & Schlein was a wonderful firm to work with. From the very first zoom conversation, I felt heard, validated, and justified. John and Sam know employment discrimination law very well and helped guide me through the process. Every step of the way, I had their support. It was…
I must say that this Law Firm was very responsive, informative and very concerned about my situation. Thank you for being so compassionate (Attorney Robinson).
The staff at this firm are incredibly kind! They also got back to me very quickly which I appreciated! Helen Robinson was absolutely wonderful and incredibly professional! She was clear and concise and answered every question I had with honesty. She made sure to explain everything in a way I…
My partner and I had worked together at a company that caused us many problems. Helen was very insightful and offered a solution to our unique problem. Everything went smoothly with Helen guiding us and the situation and we are beyond pleased with the results. We highly recommend her!
I got fantastic help from Maddie Rettig. I wish I could explain how great she was.
The staff at this firm are incredible. They want to know your story but, more than that, they want to know you. They get to know your heart and spirit so that they can serve you personally and effectively. My experience was refreshing and I felt cared for. Their work…
Would highly recommend Maddie Rettig! Very knowledgeable of all laws and regulations. She kept me informed every step of the way and was very transparent about what was going on. Very pleased customer and would refer anyone I know who needs legal counsel to Maddie!
John Marshall is a very skilled and competent attorney. I am very thankful for his professionalism, knowledge and guidance in dealing with a very difficult situation. John Marshall is someone I would highly recommend for any employment and civil rights needs.
Attorney Advertising. This information is designed for general information only. The information presented should not be construed to be formal legal advice nor the formation of a lawyer/client relationship. Past results and testimonials are not a guarantee, warranty, or prediction of the outcome of your case, and should not be construed as such. Past results cannot guarantee future performance. Any result in a single case is not meant to create an expectation of similar results in future matters because each case involves many different factors, therefore, results will differ on a case-by-case basis. By providing certain contact information herein, you are expressly authorizing the recipient of this message to contact you via the methods of communication provided.